Recurrence After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation and Investigational Biomarkers of Cardiac Remodeling.

BACKGROUND: Recurrence after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains common. We evaluated the association between recurrence and levels of biomarkers of cardiac remodeling, and their ability to improve recurrence prediction when added to a clinical prediction model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Blood samples collected before de novo catheter ablation were analyzed. Levels of bone morphogenetic protein-10, angiopoietin-2, fibroblast growth factor-23, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7, myosin-binding protein C3, growth differentiation factor-15, interleukin-6, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and high-sensitivity troponin T were measured. Recurrence was defined as ≥30 seconds of an atrial arrhythmia 3 to 12 months postablation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed using biomarker levels along with clinical covariates: APPLE score (Age >65 years, Persistent AF, imPaired eGFR [<60 ml/min/1.73m2], LA diameter ≥43 mm, EF <50%; which includes age, left atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, persistent atrial fibrillation, and estimated glomerular filtration rate), preablation rhythm, sex, height, body mass index, presence of an implanted continuous monitor, year of ablation, and additional linear ablation. A total of 1873 participants were included. A multivariable logistic regression showed an association between recurrence and levels of angiopoietin-2 (odds ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.02-1.15], P=0.007) and interleukin-6 (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 1.003-1.03]; P=0.02). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of a model that only contained clinical predictors was 0.711. The addition of any of the 9 studied biomarkers to the predictive model did not result in a statistically significant improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. CONCLUSIONS: Higher angiopoietin-2 and interleukin-6 levels were associated with recurrence after atrial fibrillation ablation in multivariable modeling. However, the addition of biomarkers to a clinical prediction model did not significantly improve recurrence prediction.

Safety of ventricular arrhythmia radiofrequency ablation with half-normal saline irrigation.

AIMS: Failure of radiofrequency (RF) ablation of ventricular arrhythmias is often due to inadequate lesion size. Irrigated RF ablation with half-normal saline (HNS) has the potential to increase lesion size and reduce sodium delivery to the patient if the same volume of RF irrigant were used for normal saline (NS) and HNS but could increase risks related to steam pops and lesion size. This study aims to assess periprocedural complications and acute ablation outcome of ventricular arrhythmias ablation with HNS. METHODS AND RESULTS: Prospective assessment of outcomes was performed in 1024 endocardial and/or epicardial RF ablation procedures in 935 consecutive patients (median age 64 years, 71.2% men, 73.4% cardiomyopathy, 47.2% sustained ventricular tachycardia). Half-normal saline was selected at the discretion of the treating physician. Radiofrequency ablation power was generally titrated to a ≤15â€…Ω impedance fall with intracardiac echocardiography monitoring. Half-normal saline was used in 900 (87.9%) and NS in 124 (12.1%) procedures. Any adverse event within 30 days occurred in 13.0% of patients treated with HNS RF ablation including 4 (0.4%) strokes/transient ischaemic attacks and 34 (3.8%) pericardial effusions requiring treatment (mostly related to epicardial access). Two steam pops with perforation required surgical repair (0.2%). Patients who received NS irrigation had less severe disease and arrhythmias. In multivariable models, adverse events and acute success of the procedure were not related to the type of irrigation. CONCLUSION: Half-normal saline irrigation RF ablation with power guided by impedance fall and intracardiac echocardiography has an acceptable rate of complications and acute ablation success while administering half of the saline load expected for NS irrigation.

Stroke and Bleeding Risks of Endocardial Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias.

BACKGROUND: Risks of radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias include emboli and bleeding complications but data on antithrombotic regimens are limited and guidelines do not specify a systematic approach. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess embolic and bleeding complications in relation to pre-periprocedure and post-periprocedure antithrombotic regimens. METHODS: Prospective assessment for complications was performed for 663 endocardial radiofrequency catheter ablation procedures in 616 consecutive patients (median age 64 years [Q1-Q3: 54-73 years], 70.3% men, 71.6% with cardiomyopathy, 44.5% with sustained ventricular tachycardia). RESULTS: There were 2 strokes (0.3%; 95% CI: 0.0%-0.8%), 1 transient ischemic attack (0.15%), and 2 pulmonary emboli (0.3%). There were 39 bleeding complications (5.9%) including 11 pericardial effusions (1.7%), and 28 related to vascular access (4.2%). Consistent with the prevalence of coronary artery disease (47.5%), atrial fibrillation (30.0%), and prior stroke (10.6%), preprocedure, 464 patients (70.0%) were taking antithrombotic agents including 220 (33.2%) taking aspirin alone (ASA), and 163 (24.6%) taking warfarin or a direct acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC). Preprocedure non-ASA antiplatelet use (OR: 2.846; P = 0.011) and DOAC use (OR: 2.585; P = 0.032) were associated with risk of bleeding complications. Following ablation, 49.8% of patients were treated with ASA 325 mg/d and 30.3% received DOACs or warfarin. New DOAC or warfarin administration was initiated in only 6.6% of patients. Overall, 39.7% of patients continued the same preprocedure antithrombotic regimen. CONCLUSIONS: Stroke is a rare complication of radiofrequency catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia using ASA 325 mg/d as a minimal postprocedure regimen with more potent regimens for selected patients.

Pulmonary Vein Myocardial Sleeve Length and its Association With Sex and 4q25/PITX2 Genotype.

BACKGROUND: Experimental evidence suggests genetic variation in 4q25/PITX2 modulates pulmonary vein (PV) myocardial sleeve length. Although PV sleeves are the main target of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, little is known about the association between different PV sleeve characteristics with ablation outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the association between clinical and genetic (4q25) risk factors with PV sleeve length in humans, and to evaluate the association between PV sleeve length and recurrence after AF ablation. METHODS: In a prospective, observational study of patients undergoing de novo AF ablation, PV sleeve length was measured using electroanatomic voltage mapping before ablation. The sentinel 4q25 AF susceptibility single nucleotide polymorphism, rs2200733, was genotyped. The primary analysis tested the association between clinical and genetic (4q25) risk factors with PV sleeve length using a multivariable linear regression model. Covariates included age, sex, body mass index, height, and persistent AF. The association between PV sleeve length and atrial arrhythmia recurrence (>30 seconds) was tested using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Between 2014 and 2019, 197 participants were enrolled (median age 63 years [IQR: 55 to 70 years], 133 male [67.5%]). In multivariable modeling, men were found to have PV sleeves 2.94 mm longer than women (95% CI: 0.99-4.90 mm; P < 0.001). Sixty participants (30.5%) had one 4q25 risk allele and 6 (3.1%) had 2 alleles. There was no association between 4q25 genotype and PV sleeve length. Forty-six participants (23.4%) experienced arrhythmia recurrence within 3 to 12 months, but there was no association between recurrence and PV sleeve length. CONCLUSIONS: Common genetic variation at 4q25 was not associated with PV sleeve length and PV sleeve length was not associated with ablation outcomes. Men did have longer PV sleeves than women, but more research is needed to define the potential clinical significance of this observation.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Bacteremia and Concomitant Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Infection remains a common cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with both left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) and cardiac implanted electronic devices (CIEDs) with limited data describing outcomes in patients who have both devices implanted. We performed a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients with both a transvenous CIED and LVAD who developed bacteremia. Ninety-one patients were evaluated. Eighty-one patients (89.0%) were treated medically and nine patients (9.9%) underwent surgical management. A multivariable logistic regression showed that blood culture positivity for >72 hours was associated with inpatient death, when controlled for age and management strategy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.73 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.34-10.4], p = 0.012). In patients who survived the initial hospitalization, the use of long-term suppressive antibiotics was not associated with the composite outcome of death or infection recurrence within 1 year, when controlled for age and management strategy (OR = 2.31 [95% CI = 0.88-2.62], p = 0.09). A Cox proportional hazards model showed that blood culture positivity for >72 hours was associated with a trend toward increased mortality in the first year, when controlled for age, management strategy, and staphylococcal infection (hazard ratio = 1.72 [95% CI = 0.88-3.37], p = 0.11). Surgical management was associated with a trend toward decreased mortality (hazard ratio = 0.23 [95% CI = 0.05-1.00], p = 0.05).

Multicenter assessment of the outcomes of subcutaneous ICD implantation in patients with prior or future sternotomy.

BACKGROUND: The subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) is a viable alternative to transvenous ICD and avoids intravascular complications in patients without a pacing indication. The outcomes of S-ICD implantation are uncertain in patients with prior sternotomy. OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare the implant techniques and outcomes with S-ICD implantation in patients with and without prior sternotomy. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective cohort study including adult patients with an S-ICD implanted between January 2014 and June 2020. Outcomes were compared between patients with and without prior sternotomy. RESULTS: Among the 212 patients (49 ± 15 years old, 43% women, BMI 30 ± 8 kg/m2 , 68% primary prevention, 30% ischemic cardiomyopathy, LVEF median 30% IQR 25%-45%) who underwent S-ICD implantation, 47 (22%) had a prior sternotomy. There was no difference in the sensing vector (57% vs. 53% primary, p = 0.55), laterality of the S-ICD lead to the sternum (94% vs. 96% leftward, p = 0.54), or the defibrillation threshold (65 ± 1.4 J vs. 65 ± 0.8 J, p = 0.76) with versus without prior sternotomy. The frequency of 30-day complications was similar with and without prior sternotomy (n = 3/47 vs. n = 15/165, 6% vs. 9%, p = 0.56). Over a median follow-up of 28 months (IQR 10-49 months), the frequency of inappropriate shocks was similar between those with and without prior sternotomy (n = 3/47 and n = 16/165, 6% vs. 10%, p = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Implantation of an S-ICD in patients with prior sternotomy is safe with a similar risk of 30-day complications and inappropriate ICD shocks as patients without prior sternotomy.

A Mechanistic Clinical Trial Using (R)- Versus (S)-Propafenone to Test RyR2 (Ryanodine Receptor) Inhibition for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation Induction.

BACKGROUND: Experimental data suggest ryanodine receptor-mediated intracellular calcium leak is a mechanism for atrial fibrillation (AF), but evidence in humans is still needed. Propafenone is composed of two enantiomers that are equally potent sodium-channel blockers; however, (R)-propafenone is an ryanodine receptor inhibitor whereas (S)-propafenone is not. This study tested the hypothesis that ryanodine receptor inhibition with (R)-propafenone prevents induction of AF compared to (S)-propafenone or placebo in patients referred for AF ablation. METHODS: Participants were randomized 4:4:1 to a one-time intravenous dose of (R)-propafenone, (S)-propafenone, or placebo. The study drug was given at the start of the procedure and an AF induction protocol using rapid atrial pacing was performed before ablation. The primary endpoint was 30 s of AF or atrial flutter. RESULTS: A total of 193 participants were enrolled and 165 (85%) completed the study protocol (median age: 63 years, 58% male, 95% paroxysmal AF). Sustained AF and/or atrial flutter was induced in 60 participants (84.5%) receiving (R)-propafenone, 60 (80.0%) receiving (S)-propafenone group, and 12 (63.2%) receiving placebo. Atrial flutter occurred significantly more often in the (R)-propafenone (N=23, 32.4%) and (S)-propafenone (N=26, 34.7%) groups compared to placebo (N=1, 5.3%, P=0.029). There was no significant difference between (R)-propafenone and (S)-propafenone for the primary outcome of AF and/or atrial flutter induction in univariable (P=0.522) or multivariable analysis (P=0.199, adjusted for age and serum drug level). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference in AF inducibility between (R)-propafenone and (S)-propafenone at clinically relevant concentrations. These results are confounded by a high rate of inducible atrial flutter due to sodium-channel blockade. REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT02710669.

Durable pulmonary vein isolation with diffuse posterior left atrial ablation using low-flow, median power, short-duration strategy.

INTRODUCTION: To target posterior wall isolation (PWI) in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, diffuse ablation theoretically confers a lower risk of conduction recovery compared to box set. We sought to assess the safety and efficacy of diffuse PWI with low-flow, medium-power, and short-duration (LF-MPSD) ablation, and evaluate the durability of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and PWI among patients undergoing repeat ablations. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients undergoing LF-MPSD ablation for AF (PVI + diffuse PWI) between August 2017 and December 2019. Clinical characteristics were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to study AF/atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence. Ablation data were analyzed in patients who underwent a repeat AF/AFL ablation. RESULTS: Of the 463 patients undergoing LF-MPSD AF ablation (PVI alone, or PVI + diffuse PWI), 137 patients had PVI + diffuse PWI. Acute PWI with complete electrocardiogram elimination was achieved in 134 (97.8%) patients. Among the 126 patients with consistent follow-up, 38 (30.2%) patients had AF/AFL recurrence during a median duration of 14 months. Eighteen patients underwent a repeat AF/AFL ablation after PVI + diffuse PWI, and 16 (88.9%) patients had durable PVI, in contrast to 10 of 45 (23.9%) patients who had redo ablation after LF-MPSD PVI alone. Seven patients (38.9%) had durable PWI, while 11 patients had partial electrical recovery at the posterior wall. The median percentage of area without electrical activity at the posterior wall was 70.7%. Conduction block across the posterior wall was maintained in 16 (88.9%) patients. CONCLUSION: There was a high rate of PVI durability in patients undergoing diffuse PWI and PVI. Partial posterior wall electrical recovery was common but conduction block across the posterior wall was maintained in most patients.

Clinical and radiographic predictors of cardiovascular implantable electronic device lead failure at the time of initial implantation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and radiographic factors associated with lead failure by comparing subjects with lead failure within 10 years of implantation with an implant-year-matched group without lead failure. METHODS: A case-control study with 49 subjects who received Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) between January 1, 1999 and July 31, 2008 and developed lead failure within 10 years of implantation in a single center. The control group consisted of subjects (n = 54) with normally functioning leads matched one-to-one by implant year. RESULTS: Among the failure group, the meantime from implantation to device lead failure was 4.70 ± 2.94 years. Older age at implantation was associated with a lower likelihood of lead failure (Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.28 (75 vs 42 years old), 95% CI 0.12-0.63, P = .002). A larger smallest loop diameter on the chest radiograph was also associated with a lower likelihood of lead failure (OR = 0.51 (31 vs 14 mm), 95% CI 0.27-0.97, P = .04). CIED type (defibrillator vs pacemaker) and Ottawa scores were not significantly associated with lead failure. Among lead-specific parameters, defibrillation lead vs pace-sense lead was associated with lead failure (OR = 3.91, 95% CI 1.95-7.81, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Younger age, defibrillation leads, and small lead loops are associated with lead failure in CIEDs. Techniques to avoid tight loops in the pocket could potentially reduce the risk of lead failure and bear important implications for the implanting physician.

Quinidine in the Management of Recurrent Ventricular Arrhythmias: A Reappraisal.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to review the utility of quinidine in patients presenting with recurrent sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA) and limited antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) options. BACKGROUND: Therapeutic options are often limited in patients with structural heart disease and recurrent VAs. Quinidine has an established role in rare arrhythmic syndromes, but its potential use in other difficult VAs has not been assessed in the present era. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 37 patients who had in-hospital quinidine initiation after multiple other therapies failed for VA suppression at our tertiary referral center. Clinical data and outcomes were obtained from the medical record. RESULTS: Of 30 patients with in-hospital quantifiable VA episodes, quinidine reduced acute VA from a median of 3 episodes (interquartile range [IQR]: 2 to 7.5) to 0 (IQR: 0 to 0.5) during medians of 3 days before and 4 days after quinidine initiation (p < 0.001). VA events decreased from a median of 10.5 episodes per day (IQR: 5 to 15) to 0.5 episodes (IQR: 0 to 4) after quinidine initiation in the 12 patients presenting with electrical storm (p = 0.004). Among the 24 patients discharged on quinidine, 13 (54.2%) had VA recurrence during a median of 138 days. Adverse effects in 9 of the 37 patients (24.3%) led to drug discontinuation, most commonly gastrointestinal intolerance. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with recurrent VAs and structural heart disease who have limited treatment options, quinidine can be useful, particularly as a short-term therapy.

Prevalence and predictors of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in young adult patients (<60 years) with pacemakers.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical trials and observational studies of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) have largely included elderly patients with mean age >70 years. The prevalence and predictors of PICM in younger patients (age < 60 years) after pacemaker implantation are not known. METHODS: Adults (18-59 years) who received single-chamber ventricular or dual-chamber pacemakers at Vanderbilt University Medical Center from 1986 to 2015 were included. Patients without documented ventricular pacing burden and patients with baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% were excluded. PICM was defined as LVEF decrease of ≥ 10% and LVEF < 50% during follow-up with right ventricular pacing ≥20%, and without alternative explanations for cardiomyopathy. RESULTS: A total of 325 patients were included in the study. During a median follow-up duration of 11.5 (Interquartile range 7-17) years, 38 patients (11.7%) developed PICM (1.3 per 100 patient-year). Older age (HR 2.5 for age ≥50 years, p = .013), reduced baseline LVEF (HR 2.4, p = .022), and preimplant AVB (HR 2.7, p = .007) were associated with an increased risk of PICM in the multivariate analysis. Furthermore, baseline AF conferred an increased risk of PICM only in patients without preimplant AVB but not patients with pre-implant AVB. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of PICM in young patients was low, but PICM could occur more than a decade after pacemaker implantation. Older age, baseline reduced LVEF, and preimplant AVB were associated with an increased risk of PICM in the young patient cohort.

Risk Factors for Repeat Infection and Mortality After Extraction of Infected Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate the factors associated with repeat infection following lead extraction procedures. BACKGROUND: Although lead extraction is an essential therapy for patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection, repeat infection still occurs in some patients. METHODS: The authors reviewed data for consecutive patients who underwent extraction of infected CIEDs from August 2003 to May 2019. Repeat infection was defined as infective endocarditis, sepsis with no alternative focus, or pocket infection after extraction of infected CIEDs. RESULTS: Extraction of infected CIEDs was performed in 496 patients. The most commonly implicated pathogen was Staphylococcus aureus (n = 188). In 449 patients (90.5%), all leads were completely extracted using only transvenous techniques. Thirty-three patients (6.7%) underwent surgical lead extraction, and 14 (2.8%) had retained leads or lead components. After a median follow-up of 352 [40 to 1,255] days after CIED extraction, 144 patients (29.0%) died. Repeat infection occurred in 47 patients (9.5%) with the median time from the extraction to repeat infection of 103 [45 to 214] days. In multivariable analysis, presence of a left ventricular assist device, younger age at extraction, and S. aureus infection were independent predictors of repeat infection. Additionally, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, presence of septic emboli, S. aureus infection, and occurrence of major complications were independent predictors of increased mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with S. aureus infection have a high risk of repeat infection and poor prognosis after CIED extraction. Repeat infection is also predicted by younger age and the presence of a left ventricular assist device, whereas mortality was predicted by congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and septic emboli.

Candidemia in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.

PURPOSE: Current guidelines recommend complete extraction of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) in the case of persistent or recurrent fungemia without other identifiable sources, though supporting evidence is lacking. We sought to evaluate the prognosis of patients with candidemia and CIEDs. METHODS: Twelve consecutive patients (54 ± 12 years, 8 male) with CIED and concurrent candidemia were reviewed. RESULTS: At the time of diagnosis with candidemia, seven patients were immunocompromised, six were on long-term antibacterial therapy, two were intravenous drug users, four were on chronic hemodialysis, and six had a central venous catheter. Four patients were confirmed as definite CIED infection as vegetation was visible on lead by echocardiogram. The other 8 patients were considered possible CIED infection with candidemia of unknown focus. All patients with visible vegetation underwent CIED removal without complications, and other patients were initially managed non-operatively. After 1 year of follow-up, 7 patients had died and at extended follow-up, all patients without lead removal died while 3 of 4 patients with lead extraction survived. Of note, 50% of deaths in the patients without lead removal were associated with fungal sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: Candida fungemia is associated with a high mortality. CIED removal should be an early consideration in these patients even if lead vegetations are not seen.

Staphylococcus bacteremia without evidence of cardiac implantable electronic device infection.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus bacteremia (SB) in the presence of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is frequently associated with CIED infection. In patients without clear CIED infection but SB, the role of empirical CIED removal is unclear. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe the natural history of SB in the setting of a CIED and the effect of CIED removal on mortality in patients with concurrent SB without evidence of CIED infection. METHODS: Three hundred sixty consecutive patients (mean age 61 ± 17 years; 255 (71%) men; 329 (92%) Staphylococcus aureus) with a CIED and concurrent SB were reviewed. RESULTS: At the initial presentation with SB, 178 patients had no evidence of CIED infection. Of these, 132 (74%) had another identified source of infection. Among the 178 patients without CIED infection, 18 (10%) had empirical CIED removal during the initial bacteremia. Among those who did not undergo CIED removal, SB subsequently relapsed in 19% and relapse rates were not different for those with or without another identifiable source at the initial presentation. Relapse was strongly associated with the duration of SB >1 day (odds ratio 9.99; 95% confidence interval 3.24-30.86). Despite the absence of CIED infection, 1-year mortality was 35% and empirical device removal during the initial presentation was associated with survival benefit (hazard ratio 0.28; 95% confidence interval 0.08-0.95). CONCLUSION: For patients with SB without evidence of CIED infection, relapse is predicted by the duration of bacteremia. Empirical CIED removal appears to be associated with a survival benefit, although there are likely clinical situations in which this could be deferred.

Conduction Recovery After Cavotricuspid Isthmus Ablation When Performed With or Without Concomitant Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to define the association between conduction recovery across the cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) and typical atrial flutter (AFL) recurrence when CTI ablation is performed with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with a stand-alone procedure. BACKGROUND: CTI ablation is commonly performed at the same time as PVI to treat AFL or as an empiric therapy. Conduction recovery is a recognized problem after linear ablation in the left atrium (e.g., mitral isthmus ablation) and is proarrhythmic. Less is known about conduction recovery after CTI ablation and possible differences in outcomes when performed at the time of PVI compared with at the time of a stand-alone procedure. METHODS: Eligible participants who underwent stand-alone CTI ablation were compared with those who underwent a combined (CTI+PVI) procedure. CTI conduction recovery was assessed at the time of a second ablation. Conduction recovery across the CTI (primary outcome) and recurrence of typical AFL (secondary outcome) were studied using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 295 eligible participants (median age: 64 years [interquartile range: 55 to 69 years]; 33% women), recovery was assessed in 232 and was more common after combined versus stand-alone CTI ablation (52% [72 of 139] vs. 13% [12 of 93]; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, CTI ablation performed as a combined procedure increased odds of CTI conduction recovery 7.8-fold (odds ratio: 7.8; 95% confidence interval: 3.3 to 18.3; p < 0.001) and clinical AFL recurrence 4.1-fold (odds ratio: 4.1; 95% confidence interval: 1.0 to 16.9; p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: CTI ablation performed at the time of atrial fibrillation ablation is associated with higher rates of conduction recovery and typical flutter recurrence.

Focal arrhythmia ablation with multipolar mapping: Does it still make sense to stay off-grid?

Multipolar mapping (MPM) has primarily been studied in complex arrhythmia substrates or reentrant circuits. Chieng et al. use a case-control design to compare MPM and point-by-point mapping with an ablation catheter for focal atrial and ventricular tachycardias, showing reduced procedure times and earlier electrograms in the MPM group but no difference in clinical outcomes. It is plausible that faster mapping and better delineation of earliest signals may translate to improved clinical outcomes if studied in a randomized trial in a larger population. Future MPM systems will guide the operator toward the focus in real-time and may even triangulate the source in three dimensions, giving an estimate of depth within the myocardium or likely focus in the opposite chamber.